With all the false assumptions put into delaying OBAMASCARE, all the smoke and mirrors could end up costing him his re-election.
President Obama tried using one old trick of political wisdom, pushing off the least appealing elements of OBAMASCARE until after the 2012 election.
But on OBAMASCARE'S one year anniversary of passage into law, this savvy, cynicl, gambit is looking less intelligent. B.H.O and the DEM"s frontloaded the bill with goodies such as, young adults staying on their parents healthcare until age 26, free money for senior's drug bills.
The DEM'S and B.H.O. thought all the controversary would vaporize once voters saw there was little to fear from a plan that was famous for cutting Medicare, increasing taxes and rationing care.
This plan basically lulled formerly skeptical independents into possibly helping re-elect B.H.O.
As B.H.O.'S re-election efforts get underway, though, the shrewdness of backloading all of the most controversial and expensive parts of this plan look dubious for a few reasons.
First, while the economy is barley improving, it's still shaky, B.H.O. hasn't been able to lay claim to progress. B.H.O.'S jobs plan with new spending on railroads and green energy programs was D.O.A . in the newly divided and dept-conscious C.ongress. Although the PR push was still seenas a campaign ploy for B.H.O.'S re-election campaign.
The false assumption here is one familar to most presidential administrations. The White House has the bully pulpit ,but administrations overestimate their ability to "drive the discussion." Incumbent presidents have many advantages at election time, but the big disadvantage is they can't run on promises and must run on records.The second proplem with the delayed implementation of OBAMASCARE is the uncertainy it has sewn.
Yours in liberty !
Bob Yeager
President Obama tried using one old trick of political wisdom, pushing off the least appealing elements of OBAMASCARE until after the 2012 election.
But on OBAMASCARE'S one year anniversary of passage into law, this savvy, cynicl, gambit is looking less intelligent. B.H.O and the DEM"s frontloaded the bill with goodies such as, young adults staying on their parents healthcare until age 26, free money for senior's drug bills.
The DEM'S and B.H.O. thought all the controversary would vaporize once voters saw there was little to fear from a plan that was famous for cutting Medicare, increasing taxes and rationing care.
This plan basically lulled formerly skeptical independents into possibly helping re-elect B.H.O.
As B.H.O.'S re-election efforts get underway, though, the shrewdness of backloading all of the most controversial and expensive parts of this plan look dubious for a few reasons.
First, while the economy is barley improving, it's still shaky, B.H.O. hasn't been able to lay claim to progress. B.H.O.'S jobs plan with new spending on railroads and green energy programs was D.O.A . in the newly divided and dept-conscious C.ongress. Although the PR push was still seenas a campaign ploy for B.H.O.'S re-election campaign.
The false assumption here is one familar to most presidential administrations. The White House has the bully pulpit ,but administrations overestimate their ability to "drive the discussion." Incumbent presidents have many advantages at election time, but the big disadvantage is they can't run on promises and must run on records.The second proplem with the delayed implementation of OBAMASCARE is the uncertainy it has sewn.
Yours in liberty !
Bob Yeager
No comments:
Post a Comment